I have just remembered that three years ago I remembered that I had already discovered who I am (not):
p.s. I just remembered that I know myself already: According to Oscar Wilde the next step is to understand that "the soul of man is not knowable", and afterwards to figure out the meaning of "one self": Assuming that I exist, Why do I exist ? [28 June 2007 - Journal of a Dead Man: ]
*
I AM A BRANDED, POLYMORPHIC, MULTI LINEAR, DYNAMIC NARRATIVE WHO IS POWERED BY THE FAITH FACTOR. A DYNAMIC NEO-STRUCTURE THAT EXISTS IN CONTEXT OF GAME. I AM AND I AM NOT.
*
The Ego is purely an administrative function. It mediates and articulates. God is I AM. I AM is Absolute Ego. Ego is Will. GOD IS ABSOLUTE WILL. If "I" is a thought, then "THE SELF" has no objective existence. The Self ("Ego") is a subjective construct - not natural. Ergo: "Identity" is disposable. Alter-Ego and Super-Ego are an aggregate of subjectivities. Personae is an entirely disposable and projected subjectivity: "essentially" (sic.) it is an act. "Active and existent" only in context of Game. Game exists as a dynamic in context of chaos. The name of the dynamic neo structure evolves. It is begotten by will. Absolute Will is God...
Has there been progress in understanding that "the soul of man is not knowable" ? Insofar as man is a social actor and a host of narratives, there is never an istance when the soul of man is definable. The soul of man is a polymorphic entity that never truly is or could be; only an entity that is constantly ceasing to be and becoming in context of chaotic permutations of matter and energy that take place in eternity. The soul of man is always NOT. Factoring the influence of reincarnation and karmic cycles governed by She (whose name is not to be written), as well as the endowment to the soul of man by He (whose name is not to be uttered) with free will, and the chaotic permutations of an indifferent nature we find that the soul of man is an entity that is at all "times" exposed to changes in context and as a result the soul of man changes in reaction to these constant imputs. The paradox is that time does not exist.
I wrote the following during a conversation on Facebook:
I do not believe that God places people in hell. I believe that people choose to place themselves in hell by rejecting God. I believe that Hell is the abscence of God in this life, the period between incarnations and in the next life; and Heaven is the precense of God in this life, the period between lives, and the next life. I am Dhjarmic in that I believe in automatic reincarnation unless the person chooses to leave the cycle of Samsara (reincarnation) through what is called "mastering the eight limbs of Yoga" (the path of the Nirvitti in Dhjarmic faiths that culminates with what in Kabbalah is called Devekuth, what in the Hermetic traditon of the West is called Unio Mistica and what in Eastern Orthodox Christianity is called Theosis). I believe that if in the period between incarnations you end up in a place without God that was your choice because you had the free will to accept and reject God as He is while incarnate. I believe that God has sent His son several times (I believe that Immanuel incarnated three times as Buddha, Socrates and Jesus Christ) to communicate to us a message about how we can be in the precence of God in the period between lives (living according to the message of Buddha, Socrates and Jesus; take your pick) or achieve Unio Mistica (becoming One With God) by mastering what figuratively is called the "eight limbs of Yoga" (very hard, one has to become a Buddhist monk or a Christian Desert Hermit to get to that level of spiritual maturity). I believe that we are free to choose to sin or to not sin (I am Pelagian in that I reject the doctrine of original sin) and that we are responsible for the consequences of either choice. If you choose to sin you place yourself away from God, if you choose to not sin you place yourself closer to God. Like I explained before, I believe that God granted man free will and designed nature to be indifferent. This because Free Will can only exist in an indifferent context. I subscribe to the definition of "nature" as the indifferent and chaotic permutation of physical matter and energy in context of infinite space (I do not believe in the existence of abstract time).
/Miguel.
veremos.
***
(C) Miguel Angel Torres, Emmanuel Goldstein
